This is designed to be plugged into a Mac computer.
#Scopebox 3 no film school pro
The lack of HDMI or SDI sets the Pro Display aside from other reference monitors, and it irks me.
This isn’t a particularly jarring issue, I feel, but I’ll bet people will complain about it and compare it to the MacBook Pro’s i9 chip overheating. That’s 77 ☏, so comfortably above room temperature. Interesting that they’d dish out a temperature in Celsius on their US website. That brighter ability won’t kick in if the monitor is over 25 ☌. Apple is claiming that it’ll sustain at 1,000 nits and have a peak of 1600 nits.
#Scopebox 3 no film school full
What also won’t happen with the Pro Display is full performance when it’s warm. So, you’re only getting a small fraction of usable screen. I’m being extremely nit-picky here though, because that Flanders monitor can only display the 3,000 nit image at a 20% scale. That 1,000-nit $35k Flanders monitor I mentioned earlier has a $45k bigger brother, which peaks at 3,000 nits. They also say that the Pro Display “produces an industry-leading 1,000 nits,” which is and isn’t true. You don’t get built-in scopes, LUT control, or any features that might help on set. Now I don’t think that Apple’s Pro Display really matches exactly to a Flanders or Sony reference monitor. But I hope you still see what the asking price for a good HDR monitor is.Ītomos' new NEON line up is a competitor with Apple's Pro Display XDR, although they are so much more than just a display. Granted, Atomos packs this monitor with way more I/O, a 4K 10-bit recorder, waveforms, LUTS, and even an accompanying app. If we were to pick the new Atomos NEON monitor that matched Apple’s Pro Display the best, it would be the 31” model. That’s why they’ve released all new 10-bit HDR monitors that directly compete with their Sumo, the Atomos NEON. While some might not notice the difference, Atomos certainly have. The display-only version costs about $1,300 right now. It had a 10-bit FRC, 1,200 nit display and all the bells and whistles you could need on set: focus peaking, waveforms, the lot. Two years ago, I reviewed Atomos’ Sumo monitor/recorder, a wonderful piece of kit that gave me hope for the future of HDR. Still, 6K is impressive and will be amazing for photographers. Unfortunately, reference monitors aren’t all the same, and newer standards like HDR10 and Dolby Vision can only be achieved with a certain class of display. That wouldn’t be a problem if these things were cheap, but an industry standard Flanders Scientific monitor will seriously set you back, and you'll want it to last years. A Flanders that’s comparable to Apple’s Pro Display XDR would cost $35,000 and would be 4K instead of 6K.Ī side note here that I prefer a true 16x9 4K reference monitor so there’s no upscaling from a 4K signal. Netflix is behind it, HBO dropped the ball on it with Game of Thrones, and content producers need to get on board. When Apple debuted the iPhone X, nearly all of the lauded features pertained to watching HDR content. I’ve said for a few years now that HDR is the future. These are comparable Flanders Scientific reference monitors. If Apple's monitor is as good as they say it is, then it competes with the best.
0 kommentar(er)
